It was probably quite an embarrassing appearance in court for Mr Chamberlain. On Saturday, November 13 1858 he was out late in Bridgewater Gardens in the City, and on his way home. He’d had a lot to drink but thought he was in control of himself (don’t we all!)
Two women approached him on the street and asked him if they’d like to ‘treat them to some gin’. This was a common enough solicitation by prostitutes and there is little doubt that Chamberlain, a musician by trade, understood this. He took them up on the offer and the trio headed for Spurgeon’s public house where they drank together.
Some time afterwards they all left the pub and the women (he says) dragged him reluctantly across the square. Having got him into a dark corner of the gardens two men rushed up and robbed him while the women held him and unbuttoned his clothes. He tried to resist but one of the women hit him in the face and knocked him down. He lost a fob watch in the process.
At least this is the story he told the Guildhall Police court magistrate Alderman Lawrence. Only one defendant was in court to hear the charge. Mary Blake had been picked up by police at a pub in Goswell Street the following day, but denied any knowledge of the crime. She had been in Bridgewater Gardens that evening but hadn’t met with the prosecutor.
Her lawyer said it was a case of mistaken identity and Chamberlain, who was by his admission drunk at the time, was an unreliable witness. The alderman was inclined to agree but Blake was a ‘bad character’ and reportedly ran a brothel so he decided to remand her in custody to see him more evidence could be found in the meantime.
It doesn’t look like any more evidence was forthcoming because there’s no record of a trial or prosecution for Mary. This is hardly surprising; this sort of encounter was common and very hard to prosecute successfully. Without the watch being found on Mary, with the victim effectively admitting he’d chosen to go for a drink with known prostitutes, and his drunken state (which impaired both his judgment and his ability to make a clear identification of the culprits), no jury would have convicted her.
[from The Morning Chronicle, Tuesday, November 16, 1858]